Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Monday, December 19, 2011
International Scores
International Scores: Get the latest scores of all the international cricket matches from Cricinfo. Add the Cricinfo International Scores widget now!
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Harbhajan Singh recovers stolen documents
Harbhajan Singh,
the India offspinner, has recovered a part of his valuables which were
stolen from his car on the Punjab-Delhi highway. Haryana Police on
Tuesday found his bag, lying in an abandoned area, which contained his
passport and other documents, including credit cards. However, cash to
the tune of Rs 9500 is still missing.
Harbhajan registered the theft at the local police station, after his parked car was broken into outside a coffee shop.
"It took us only three minutes to go to Cafe Coffee Day and bring coffee
back to our car. But when we reached, we were shocked to find that our
car glass had been cut and our important belongings were not to be
found," Harbhajan told The Indian Express.
He was recently ruled out of Punjab's Ranji Trophy campaign after a
long-standing shin injury in his left leg resurfaced. Harbhajan, who was
leading Punjab, was using the Ranji matches to try and make a comeback
to the Indian team. He had returned home early during the tour of
England because of an abdomen injury and was then left out of the home
series against England and West Indies. Harbhajan was also not selected
in the Test squad for the upcoming tour of Australia.
Kumble quits as NCA chief
|
|||
Anil Kumble,
the former India captain, has resigned as chairman of the National
Cricket Academy (NCA) over what he says was a lack of "alignment"
between his vision for the NCA and the rest of the committee's.
An official statement from the BCCI for the reasons for Kumble's
decision is awaited. He is tipped to be replaced, at least on an interim
basis, by MP Pandove, the chairman of the BCCI's specialised academies
committee and a member of the IPL governing council.
"I had a three-year vision, a holistic approach for the NCA that was
not in alignment with that of the rest of the committee," Kumble told
ESPNcricinfo. "It didn't make sense to me to just be a figurehead in
this kind of a situation. So I thought it was better that somebody else
take over." In his role as chairman, Kumble told PTI, he had made 10 presentations to the committee about his vision for the NCA.
The NCA committee, as listed on website, is made up of 14 members
including Kumble. The other committee members are BCCI president N
Srinivasan, joint secretaries Sanjay Jagdale and Anurag Thakur,
treasurer Ajay Shirke, chief-administrative officer Ratnakar Shetty,
vice-chairman Ranjib Biswal, NCA Board members Anirudh Chaudhry, TC
Mathew, Rakesh Parikh, Bikash Baruah and Gyanendra Pandey, director, NCA
cricket operations Sandeep Patil and administration manager AK Jha.
Kumble is president of the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA)
and chief mentor of the Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL team. The post
of NCA chairman, an honorary post, was Kumble's first official BCCI
position since being elected KSCA president last year. He denied that
his decision to quit a day after an NCA meeting in Chennai was due to
arguments in Monday's BCCI working committee meeting over apparent
conflict of interest issues concerning him. Board rules require that any
resignation must be tabled before a working committee.
Two months ago, controversy arose
over Kumble's co-ownership of a talent management firm called Tenvic
that has on its books several young players including R Vinay Kumar and S
Aravind, both of whom have been part of recent India squads and also
play for the Royal Challengers. Tenvic - named after Kumble's ten-wicket
haul against Pakistan in 1999 - looks after the commercial interests of
the players but Kumble has consistently denied any conflict of interest between his administrative and mentoring roles.
He said at the time that "less than 2%" of Tenvic's business was related
to "mentoring cricketers", and that too without any commercial benefit
Friday, October 28, 2011
Ganguly back in Bengal Ranji squad
|
|||
Sourav Ganguly
has made himself available for selection for Bengal's entire domestic
season in 2011-12, according to Bengal selection committee chairman Deep Dasgupta.
"It shows how motivated Ganguly is to play this season. He trains
regularly to keep himself in shape and will be available for the entire
Ranji Trophy, one-day and T20 tournaments," Dasgupta told PTI. "His
presence in the dressing room itself will be a big inspiration for the
youngsters."
However, Ganguly's other career - as a television commentator - may
prevent him from playing the full season. ESPNcricinfo understands that
Ganguly will be in Australia from early December to cover India's tour,
which ends on March 8. The Test leg of the tour, though, finishes on
January 28.
Ganguly, 39, had retired from international cricket in November 2008
after which he was primarily involved in the Indian Premier League. He
played only two Ranji Trophy matches for Bengal in the 2010-11 season,
scoring 13 and 7.
The 16-man squad for Bengal's first two Ranji Trophy Super League
matches, against Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, will be led by Manoj
Tiwary, with wicketkeeper Wriddhiman Saha as vice-captain.
Squad: Manoj Tiwary (capt), Wriddhiman Saha (vc & wk), Sourav
Ganguly, Laxmi Ratan Shukla, Arindam Das, Rohan Banerjee, Abhishek
Jhunjhunwala, Arindam Ghosh, Partha Sarathi Bhattacharjee, Ranadeb Bose,
Ashok Dinda, Mohammad Sami Ahmed, Saurashish Lahiri, Iresh Saxena,
Writam Porel, Anirban Gupta.
Dhoni may be rested for Tests against West Indies
To play MS Dhoni
or bench him? That will be one of the biggest questions facing the
India selectors tomorrow evening when they meet in Kolkata to pick the
squad for the first Test against West Indies. The other big question is
likely to concern Harbhajan Singh, who was dropped from the five-match
one-day series against England at home, which India won by an emphatic
5-0 scoreline.
Logic would suggest that Dhoni, the India captain, be rested. He has
been walking wounded, having had sore fingers since the disastrous
England tour during which India failed to win a single game. While as
many as ten of his team-mates fell by the wayside due to various
injuries, Dhoni took the beating across the four Tests, the solitary
Twenty20 match and the five ODIs. Despite his grit and steadfastness,
Dhoni's wicketkeeping was affected as the tour wore on. The selectors
will consider that, with an important tour of Australia scheduled
straight after the home series against West Indies.
It is understood that Dhoni has not asked for a break but the majority
of the five-man selection panel are in favour of resting him for the
three-match Test series against West Indies, which starts in Delhi from
November 6. "Quite a few of the selectors empathise with him [Dhoni].
They want to rest him as they know he is exhausted," a BCCI official
said.
If Dhoni is rested, Virender Sehwag, who returned to competitive cricket
during the group stages of the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, India's
domestic Twenty20 competition, is likely to lead the side. Sehwag, who
had joined the India squad in England halfway through the Test series
after undergoing shoulder surgery, was forced to return having failed to
recuperate completely.
In the past, Sehwag has led India in three Tests:
in Ahmedabad against Sri Lanka (2005), in Napier against New Zealand
(2009), and then against Bangladesh in Chittagong (2010).
It is not just the question of whether to rest Dhoni that will make this
one of the most interesting selection meetings in the recent past.
Harbhajan has apparently fallen out of favour with the selectors, after
taking just two wickets in two Tests in England and 11 over three in the
West Indies before that. R Ashwin was handed the responsibility of
leading the spin attack in the home ODIs against England and impressed
with 10 wickets at an average of 20.20, leaving the selectors split. An
abdomen strain ruled Harbhajan out of the latter half of the England
tour but he bounced back by leading Mumbai Indians to the Champions
League Twenty20 title in the absence of the injured Sachin Tendulkar.
"It is a difficult one for sure. Ashwin has been performing
consistently," the BCCI official said.
Apart from Sehwag, the other players who have recovered from the
injuries they sustained in England are Gautam Gambhir (concussion),
Sachin Tendulkar (inflamed toe), Yuvraj Singh (broken finger) and Ishant
Sharma (ankle injury).
Zaheer Khan, India's spearhead, is still recuperating after undergoing
surgery on his ankle. Praveen Kumar, who led the attack manfully in
England, is likely to be joined by Sreesanth and Ishant in the
fast-bowling department. Pragyan Ojha could pip Amit Mishra for the
second spinner's spot. In other duels, Wriddhiman Saha could be the
second-choice wicketkeeper ahead of Parthiv Patel, who did not do
himself any favours during the recent home ODI series.
One man who did tilt the scales in his favour is Virat Kohli, the highest run-getter
in the home ODI series against England. If Kohli is selected it will
leave Yuvraj Singh and Suresh Raina in a fight for the last batsman's
spot. Cheteshwar Pujara, who picked up a knee injury during this year's
IPL, has said he is close to match-fit again, but is targeting the
Australia series for a comeback to the India squad.
Squad (probable): MS Dhoni (capt/wk), Virender Sehwag
(vice-captain), Gautam Gambhir, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, VVS
Laxman, Virat Kohli, Yuvraj Singh/Suresh Raina, Wriddhiman Saha/Parthiv
Patel, Harbhajan Singh/R Ashwin, Pragyan Ojha, Praveen Kumar, Ishant
Sharma, Sreesanth
Sunday, October 9, 2011
India and Pakistan: Survival of the fittest
In a week famous for sixty-fourth anniversaries, India and Pakistan
might wish to reflect on the fruits of those intervening years of toil
on the cricket field. When midnight’s chimes created two nations in 1947
greater concerns about the division of land, people, infrastructure,
and wealth preoccupied people’s minds than partition of cricketing
abilities.
Today, India stride the upper echelons of cricket both in running the game and performing on the field, despite this summer’s disappointing effort. Pakistan, meanwhile, are struggling to avoid outcast status and soon will do battle with Zimbabwe at the foot of the international table. These might turn out to be transitory positions but at the moment there is a hint of permanency about them.
The 1947 distribution of cricketing talents has given rise to broad generalisations, which have to some degree held true. Pakistan has been blessed with fast bowlers of world class, from Fazal Mahmood, through Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, and Waqar Younis, to the cursed pair of Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Amir. Even now, Pakistan’s young breed of Wahab Riaz and Junaid Khan are offering hope that the line will continue.
India’s pacemen have been more sporadic and less dominant. Kapil Dev, Javagal Srinath, and Zaheer Khan have fought lone battles. Hypotheses for this disparity have been many: genetic differences, climate, even diet. None are satisfactory or barely plausible. Is there much difference between Delhi and Lahore? The migrations at partition will have made the region more homogenous not less.
Indeed, Pakistan’s fast bowlers weren’t especially formidable before Imran Khan, who was greatly influenced and motivated by the speed sensations he encountered during World Series Cricket, the formidable Australian and West Indian pacemen of his era. They were Imran’s role models, driving him to higher speeds and achievement. In turn, Imran was the inspiration of the many Pakistani fast bowlers who followed, and soon he was joined by Wasim and Waqar who created their own legacies and legends.
This role-model theory helps explain the different routes taken by cricketers of both nations. India has a regal history in batsmanship, from the masters of bygone days through Sunil Gavaskar, Dilip Vengsarkar, and Mohammad Azharuddin to today’s holy trinity of Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, and Sachin Tendulkar. These batting riches are beyond the dreams of Pakistanis who have had to be satisfied with a disintegrating line of Hanif Mohommad, Zaheer Abbas, Javed Miandad, Inzamam-ul Haq, and Mohammad Yousuf, a heritage which ends in nothingness.
While bowling is a natural skill that tolerates imitation, batting is more technical and it is not possible to simply rely on following your hero’s example. Success in batting requires advanced technique and a cricketing infrastructure to support the maturation of batsmen. A supportive infrastructure is dependent on the cricket board creating a stable environment for its players. It is here that the failings of Pakistan’s successive cricket boards have had the most damaging effect, and the explanation why batting has become a lost art in Pakistan cricket while fast bowlers emerge unhindered.
The success of Indian cricket as an enterprise offers it an opportunity to overcome weaknesses in fast bowling if it chooses to invest in the development of wicket-taking Test fast bowlers rather than breeding run-stoppers for the Indian Premier League. As unlikely as that prospect might be, notwithstanding the way India’s bowling has been exposed on this tour of England, the plight of Pakistan’s batsmen appears far bleaker.
Yet the joyous celebrations that marked Pakistan’s Independence Day were a reminder that hope can remain strong even in the face of near calamity. Indeed, the best international performance by a South Asian this summer has come from Pakistan’s Asad Rauf. Both Rauf and Aleem Dar have shown that excellence is achievable whatever the circumstances. Admittedly, ICC’s governance of the elite panel has helped nurture them away from the clutches of the Pakistan Cricket Board. Rauf and Dar have helped banish the ill-repute of Pakistani umpires, a reputation that was well earned, as it was too by umpires of the cricketing powers of Australia, England, and India.
So, 64 years has brought us fearsome fast bowlers from Pakistan and wizardly batsmen from India. It has brought us innovative spin bowlers and disastrous fielders from both nations. But it has left us with serious challenges. What can Pakistan cricket, and its batsmen specifically, do to flourish again? Is survival even possible? What can India do to remedy its weakness in fast bowling, and what on earth has happened to Indian umpires? Do they still exist?
Perhaps we are witnessing another fine example of Darwinian thinking? Indian batsmen and Pakistani fast bowlers, Indian administrators and Pakistani umpires, this is survival of the fittest.
Today, India stride the upper echelons of cricket both in running the game and performing on the field, despite this summer’s disappointing effort. Pakistan, meanwhile, are struggling to avoid outcast status and soon will do battle with Zimbabwe at the foot of the international table. These might turn out to be transitory positions but at the moment there is a hint of permanency about them.
The 1947 distribution of cricketing talents has given rise to broad generalisations, which have to some degree held true. Pakistan has been blessed with fast bowlers of world class, from Fazal Mahmood, through Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, and Waqar Younis, to the cursed pair of Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Amir. Even now, Pakistan’s young breed of Wahab Riaz and Junaid Khan are offering hope that the line will continue.
India’s pacemen have been more sporadic and less dominant. Kapil Dev, Javagal Srinath, and Zaheer Khan have fought lone battles. Hypotheses for this disparity have been many: genetic differences, climate, even diet. None are satisfactory or barely plausible. Is there much difference between Delhi and Lahore? The migrations at partition will have made the region more homogenous not less.
Indeed, Pakistan’s fast bowlers weren’t especially formidable before Imran Khan, who was greatly influenced and motivated by the speed sensations he encountered during World Series Cricket, the formidable Australian and West Indian pacemen of his era. They were Imran’s role models, driving him to higher speeds and achievement. In turn, Imran was the inspiration of the many Pakistani fast bowlers who followed, and soon he was joined by Wasim and Waqar who created their own legacies and legends.
This role-model theory helps explain the different routes taken by cricketers of both nations. India has a regal history in batsmanship, from the masters of bygone days through Sunil Gavaskar, Dilip Vengsarkar, and Mohammad Azharuddin to today’s holy trinity of Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, and Sachin Tendulkar. These batting riches are beyond the dreams of Pakistanis who have had to be satisfied with a disintegrating line of Hanif Mohommad, Zaheer Abbas, Javed Miandad, Inzamam-ul Haq, and Mohammad Yousuf, a heritage which ends in nothingness.
While bowling is a natural skill that tolerates imitation, batting is more technical and it is not possible to simply rely on following your hero’s example. Success in batting requires advanced technique and a cricketing infrastructure to support the maturation of batsmen. A supportive infrastructure is dependent on the cricket board creating a stable environment for its players. It is here that the failings of Pakistan’s successive cricket boards have had the most damaging effect, and the explanation why batting has become a lost art in Pakistan cricket while fast bowlers emerge unhindered.
The success of Indian cricket as an enterprise offers it an opportunity to overcome weaknesses in fast bowling if it chooses to invest in the development of wicket-taking Test fast bowlers rather than breeding run-stoppers for the Indian Premier League. As unlikely as that prospect might be, notwithstanding the way India’s bowling has been exposed on this tour of England, the plight of Pakistan’s batsmen appears far bleaker.
Yet the joyous celebrations that marked Pakistan’s Independence Day were a reminder that hope can remain strong even in the face of near calamity. Indeed, the best international performance by a South Asian this summer has come from Pakistan’s Asad Rauf. Both Rauf and Aleem Dar have shown that excellence is achievable whatever the circumstances. Admittedly, ICC’s governance of the elite panel has helped nurture them away from the clutches of the Pakistan Cricket Board. Rauf and Dar have helped banish the ill-repute of Pakistani umpires, a reputation that was well earned, as it was too by umpires of the cricketing powers of Australia, England, and India.
So, 64 years has brought us fearsome fast bowlers from Pakistan and wizardly batsmen from India. It has brought us innovative spin bowlers and disastrous fielders from both nations. But it has left us with serious challenges. What can Pakistan cricket, and its batsmen specifically, do to flourish again? Is survival even possible? What can India do to remedy its weakness in fast bowling, and what on earth has happened to Indian umpires? Do they still exist?
Perhaps we are witnessing another fine example of Darwinian thinking? Indian batsmen and Pakistani fast bowlers, Indian administrators and Pakistani umpires, this is survival of the fittest.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Sunil Joshi appointed Hyderabad coach
|
|||
Sunil Joshi,
the former India spinner, has been appointed the new head coach of
Hyderabad, ending his 19-year domestic career. Joshi played in last
year's Ranji Trophy semi-final, which Karnataka lost to Baroda, but said
he is ready for the next phase in his career.
"I have been in talks with the Hyderabad Cricket Association for a while
and they offered me the coach's position," Joshi told the Hindu.
It fits in well with my career and I am ready for this transition. I am
qualified and have done my Level II and III courses at the National
Cricket Academy and have also gained the Level II certificate from the
England and Wales Cricket Board."
Hyderabad had a poor Ranji Trophy season last year. They were bowled out
for 21 in their opening game of the season, when Rajasthan's Deepak
Chahar took 8 for 10 on debut, a result that saw several heads roll.
They recovered somewhat from that point to finish fourth in their group,
above Jharkhand and Tripura, and Joshi said he hopes he can "help the
team improve its performance and qualify for the Elite section next
year".
The 41-year-old Joshi took 41 wickets in 15 Tests and 69 wickets in 69
ODIs for India. The highlight of his international career was a
remarkable spell of 10-6-6-5 in a one-dayer against South Africa. He was
an integral part of the Karnataka state team since the 1992-93 season,
having taken 615 first-class wickets at an average of 25.12 and a
strike-rate of 62.1.
In the long run, Joshi said he would live to give back to Karnataka
cricket. "I would love to nurture spinners at the State academy and also
help Karnataka in whatever role is possible.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Kambli retires from first-class cricket
Former India batsman Vinod Kambli has announced his retirement from first-class cricket. Kambli, 39, had earlier retired from international cricket in 2009.
"Till the last year, I was raring to go [in domestic cricket]. I served
Mumbai for long, but the selectors ignored me. I'm disappointed," Kambli
said. "I wanted to play alongside Sachin [Tendulkar] for one last time,
wanted to play in IPL but unfortunately that did not happen."
Kambli made his first-class debut for Mumbai in 1989 and played 129
games, scoring 9965 runs at an average of 59.67 including 35 centuries.
He last played senior domestic cricket in 2004-05.
He made his international debut in 1993, and played 17 Tests, scoring
1084 runs at an average of 54.20 which included double-centuries in his
third and fourth Tests. He also played 104 ODIs for India scoring 2477
runs, but erratic form and compounded by indiscipline problems meant he
made as many as nine comebacks in the ODI team. He last played Test
cricket in 1995 and wasn't picked in the ODI team after October 2000.
Since being out of the Indian and Mumbai teams, he has tried his hand at
movies and reality shows on the small screen.
Kambli indicated he would now most likely turn to coaching youngsters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)